- In the comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs MediaTek Helio P65, we've compared their tests and benchmark scores side-by-side.
- The MediaTek Helio P65 brings a new wave of hardware that mixes big Arm core performance and a new Arm G52-class GPU that lifts the bar for performance mainstream users and avid mobile gamers. This leading technology mix offers up to 25% faster performance versus competitor alternatives that use older generation cores.
- The MediaTek Helio P65's CPU features two Cortex-A75 and six Cortex-A55 cores. For comparison, the Helio P60/P70 used four A73 and four A53 (older generation, but a different proportion of.
The Mediatek Helio P65 is a mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in mid 2019. It is manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET (12FFC) process and is equipped with 2x. Affinity publisher for ipad. Deezer military discount. Everywhere Enhancements for Great Gaming. The MediaTek Helio P65 brings a new wave of.
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) | |||||
Helio P65 (MT6768) | 56% | Snapdragon 662 | 68% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu 8
Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speedHelio P65 (MT6768) | Snapdragon 662 | |
Total score | 166391 | 182816 |
CPU | 54065 | 54773 |
GPU | 45972 | 68249 |
MEM | 35447 | 31556 |
UX | 30965 | 28478 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performanceHelio P65 (MT6768) | Snapdragon 662 | |
Single-Core | 341 | 374 |
Multi-Core | 1432 | 1573 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Helio P65 (MT6768) | Snapdragon 662 | |
Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Bit | 64 | 64 |
Lithography | 12 nm | 11 nm |
Transistors count | ||
Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | |
Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) |
Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
Memory Frequency | 1800 | 1866/933 |
Memory bandwidth | 13.41 | 13.91 |
Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No |
L1 cache | ||
L2 cache | ||
L3 cache | ||
Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
GPU and Media
GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 610 |
GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 750 MHz |
GFloPS | 184 | 312 |
# of Cores | 3 | |
# of Shader Units | 192 | |
Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile | 21.4 | 24.9 |
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.5 | 29.8 |
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 55.9 | 61.5 |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.7 | 32.4 |
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 22.9 | 25.6 |
Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 31.7 | 35.2 |
Real Racing 3 | 69.9 | 92.3 |
Sniper 3D | 72.7 | 98.4 |
Need for Speed No Limits | 78.3 | 86.1 |
Mortal Kombat X | 64.3 | 80 |
CSR Racing 2 | 61.5 | 86.1 |
Cameras
Camera resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP |
Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 340T | |
Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 |
Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD |
Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation
Modem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem |
Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. |
Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. |
Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | |
NFC support | No | No |
5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better:
Mediatek Mt6768 Helio P65 (12nm)
8The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is better: 23
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Helio G95
• Vs Snapdragon 765G
• Vs Snapdragon 855
• Vs Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Helio G90
• MediaTek Dimensity 700 Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Helio G90T
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Tiger T710
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• MediaTek Dimensity 800U Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Snapdragon 750G Vs Snapdragon 662
• MediaTek Dimensity 700 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Unisoc Tiger T710 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Unisoc Tiger T610 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• HiSilicon Kirin 710A Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Snapdragon 662 specs and review.
Categories |
• Comparisons • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • GPU comparisons • GPU Fortnite Mobile • GPU PUBG mobile • GPU Benchmarks • GPU Devices lists • GPU SoCs lists • Processor comparisons • Cinebench r15 • Cinebench r20 • Cinebench r23 • GeekBench 5 • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile • Fortnite CPU • Roblox CPU • Valorant CPU • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU • Apex Legends CPU • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU • Overwatch CPU • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU • DOOM Eternal CPU • Assassin's Creed CPU • GTA 5 CPU • PUBG CPU • GPU list • Processor list |
Mobile SoC Brands |
Processor Brands |
Last added |
•Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-1180G7. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-9600K. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-1145G7E. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-1185G7E. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 3 PRO 420. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 3 PRO 435. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-1145GRE. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-1160G7. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 5 4500U. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-9750H. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 3 4300G. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-1140G7. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-1185G7. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 3 PRO 435. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 3 4300GE. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 3 3100. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-1145G7. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-10600T. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-11370H. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-11375H. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 5 1600. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-7800X. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-10750H. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-10400F. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-10400. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-9700E. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-10850H. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-5960X. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 5 PRO 440. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-10600KF. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 5 PRO 465. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 3 3300X. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i5-10600K. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 5 5600U. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-8086K. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-9700KF. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 7 PRO 170. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Core i7-9700K. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 7 2700E. •Ryzen 3 5300G vs Ryzen 7 1700. |
ChipGuider.com - All about any processors and chips: desktop CPU, mobile SoC, GPU. 2021(c) |
VS
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and MediaTek Helio P65 (Arm Mali-G52 2EEMC2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. Skjoet consulting driver download.
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
Single and multi-core processor tests
29
27
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
15
14
Efficiency of battery consumption
67
54
Overall chip score
34
31
Main differences and advantages of each chip
- Performs 4.8x better in floating-point computations
- Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Helio
- Announced 7-months later
- Has a smaller size transistor (11 versus 12 nm)
Pros of MediaTek Helio P65
- Higher GPU frequency (~37%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksHelio P65 Vs Snapdragon 730
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
180239
184808
CPU | 69810 | 64553 |
GPU | 34159 | 29759 |
Memory | 44417 | 31973 |
UX | 33716 | 34654 |
Total score | 180239 | 184808 |
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
314
347
1397
1274
Image compression | 90.6 Mpixels/s | - |
Face detection | 13.25 images/s | - |
Speech recognition | 23.7 words/s | - |
Machine learning | 17.85 images/s | - |
Camera shooting | 11.8 images/s | - |
HTML 5 | 1.9 Mnodes/s | - |
SQLite | 505.85 Krows/s | - |
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile | 28 FPS [Low] | - |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 30 FPS [Ultra] | - |
Fortnite | 26 FPS [Low] | - |
Shadowgun Legends | 54 FPS [Low] | - |
World of Tanks Blitz | 59 FPS [Medium] | - |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 30 FPS [High] | - |
Device | Xiaomi Poco M3 1080 x 2340 | - |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 662 and Helio P65Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Process | 11 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Transistor count | - | 5.5 billion |
TDP | 9 W | - |
GPU name | Adreno 610 | Arm Mali-G52 2EEMC2 |
Architecture | Adreno 600 | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 820 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shading units | 96 | 32 |
FLOPS | 272 Gigaflops | 56.4 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 13.91 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 683 | NeuroPilot |
Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Modem | X11 | - |
4G support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 7 |
5G support | No | No |
Download speed | Up to 390 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 100 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Announced | January 2020 | June 2019 |
Class | Mid range | Mid range |
Model number | SM615 | - |
Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site | MediaTek Helio P65 official site |
So, which SoC would you choose?
120 (68.2%)
56 (31.8%)
Total votes: 176
2.Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
4.Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
6.MediaTek Helio P65 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
8.MediaTek Helio P65 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
10.MediaTek Helio P65 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710